This document is an online supplement to the following manuscript:
Grenié M., Bruelheide H., Dawson W., Essl F., van Kleunen M., Kühn I., Kref H., Pyšek P., Weigelt P., and Winter M.. Gaps in global non-native plant trait data and how to fill them. EcoEvoRxiv preprint: https://doi.org/10.32942/X2FH0T
It aims to provide some interactive figures to make easier exploration of the data produced in the paper. It also displays the trait description network that links all the trait concepts across databases and let users download the table behind the trait description.
This is an extended version of figure 2, presenting the trait
combination availability across the different plant families. This
figure is a treemap, where each area represents the proportion of
non-native species with the given trait combination. The taxonomical
families are ordered by the number of non-native species in our dataset.
This extended figure uses plotly
and help you explore the
dataset and export a snapshot of the plot.
The referenced trait combinations are as follow:
Treemap of trait combination availabilities across taxonomic families. The size of rectangles is proportional to the number of non-native species referenced in our dataset. The different colors represent the different available trait combinations: light gray = no trait are available for these species; darker gray = at least one trait is available in our dataset; orange = the four root traits are availabe; light purple = the three LHS traits are available; light brown = both LHS and root traits are available; dark purple = the six aboveground spectrum traits are available; dark brown = both aboveground spectrum and root traits are available.
We here present the trait concept network we used to combine the trait datasets. This is the table presented as Table S1. Basically this is a combination of the trait concepts from AusTraits, BIEN, GIFT, and TRY. The trait are matched based on the Austraits Plant traits Dictionary (APD) and manual matching. Then all the traits concepts that in the same connected component of the network are considered identical. Here we aren’t showing the network graphically because of performance issues for moderately large networks (~3000 nodes and ~2000 edges). We’re interested showing the collated table version which contains the following columns:
component
, number of the connected component the trait
name network ordered by size.consolidated_name
, automatically assigned name of the
component for understanding.component_size
, size of the connected component in
number of nodes (= trait names)austraits_trait_name
, trait name provided as in
AusTraits.bien_trait_name
, trait name provided as in BIENgift_trait_name
, trait name provided as in GIFT
corresponding to the “Trait2” level.try_trait_id
, trait id as provided in TRY TraitID
columnThe buttons allow you to directly download the entire table.